Pages

Friday, March 5, 2010

Am I An Optimist?

Sir Winston Churchill once said, "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." I always figured myself as a pessimist. I don't know why, but I tend have a somewhat grumpy demeanor, and since grumpy and pessimist seem to go hand-in-hand, I just figured I was a negative guy. Upon further review, I am not. I am a closet optimist.

I was not able to understand this until I found myself spending more time with someone who I truly believe is a pessimist to their very core. It was in this situation that I realized the difference between mood and outlook. Since I am often in a grumpy mood, I assumed I had a grumpy outlook, but I really have a positive outlook.

Basically, where I am right now is where most teachers are. We struggle every single day to figure out what is best for our students. How do we make sure they are prepared for what lies ahead? It was during one of these conversations that I realized I am not only an optimist, but a fierce and passionate optimist when it comes to my students. The discussion was over what students "need" to learn in high school. I was stating my belief that we should treat every student as though they are going to attend college and make sure they get the information and skills they would need to pursue that course. On the other side of the discussion were those who believe a majority of our students will not attend college and therefore do not need much more than basic academic skills with a heavy dose of life skills.

Do not get me wrong, I think kids need to learn to address envelopes, pay bills, change a tire, cook without burning their house down, etc., but I simply cannot exist in a world where I accept from the word go that my students CAN'T achieve higher education. The system as proposed by my colleague would basically allow students to be split into two groups (either by student/parent choice or some kind of test, I guess) and those who are deemed "college bound" would get the education that we are basically offering all students now, while the ones who are decided to be only fit for unskilled labor will take classes on basic life skills.

How does this define me as an optimist? I honestly, to the core of me, believe that nearly every single student currently enrolled at PCHS has the ability to achieve not only a high school diploma but also education after high school. That education may not be at a university, but certainly they can all attend a community college, trade school, apprenticeship program, or any of the other opportunities out there for someone who has graduated high school. I don't believe that some students are incapable of grasping complex material for any of the reasons being given (poverty, parents who lack education, etc.). I am an optimist because I believe every student who walks into my class can meet my expectations for them if they choose to do so.

16 comments:

  1. The biggest argument I have for those who say that the basics and life skills are what some of our students need in order to get unskilled jobs is that there are NO MORE UNSKILLED JOBS! Show me a growth sector where workers with just a high school diploma are in demand! We should want out of school for our students what we would want for our own children! Sign me up for the optimistic side of the argument! We will never get anymore out of our students than what we expect.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm definitely an optimist. I also believe that grouping student into college bound and non-college bound would be a disaster. Who would decide? Because I know a lot of adults who used to swear up and down that they would NEVER go to college, and guess what, those people currently have college degrees or are attending college. Some of these kids are so against school that the idea of college is repulsive. What they don't understand is that in the real world, having an education REALLY helps. That's why we're here, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am a realist. Not every is skilled at the same things. Some people are not skilled at "school". We need to tap into other skills and teach them.

    Teachers were good at "school" and seem to have little understanding or sympathy for those who are not.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Actually, I wasn't very good at "school", but it turns out that a lot of the things I needed to work on to make it through "school" are skills I need to keep a "job" to earn "money" so that I can take care of my "family". Of course kids don't all have the same set of skills and they aren't all ready to be scholars, but if they were we wouldn't be needed. Imagine if cavemen had looked at sticks and said, "Let's be real. They are just sticks and that is all they can be." We wouldn't have fire, and I couldn't grill steak. If we just look at our kids and see what they can't yet do and just resign ourselves to the fact that they will never learn to do it, what do we see as our roll?

    ReplyDelete
  5. You have absolutely no idea what it is like to read at a 3rd grade level in high school. Your idea of not being good at school is so far removed from MY students' ideas of not being good at school.

    My role is to get students as far as they can possibly go with their capabilities -not to try to push them so hard that they simply give up.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Okay. I calmed down and reread your blog, and I guess we agree a lot more than we disagree. I agree that there are no more unskilled jobs. I also agree that most students can and should get into some type of post-high school training or educational program.

    We do disagree on what should be in the curriculum for those kids who don't plan on attending a 4 year college. I am big on kids getting hands-on experiences that will benefit them in whatever field they want to enter after high school.

    I can see spending 2 years exposing all students to it all - research papers, Shakespeare, the whole schmoe - and then having electives that they could choose from, depending on their goals and interests.

    Thanks a lot for getting my blood pressure up, Ogle. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  7. We don't even disagree on that, Pam. I want to change the curriculum too. I think we can give kids real-world, hands-on learning that exposes them to the skills they will need no matter what they choose to do after graduation while also addressing the academic core. When I talk about this stuff, my goal is not to exclude your students, but rather to consider the reasons they don't see a point in school and make school work for them. The differnce between the bottom 10% and the top 10% is not that the top sees a point, just that they are willing to jump through the hoops. The changes I envision would create a richer learning environment for every student from the bottom to the top.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't have the answers for why school isn't working for my kids. I wish I did. And I am willing to try just about anything to make it better for them.

    We are both passionate about our students and what is best for them. That makes us both awesome. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm all for life skills (consumer ed, technology use, parenting, adult living) and the basic subjects at the underclassmen level, but think kids should be able to choose majors. Even back in my day, I was on the college prep track as early as my freshmen year. Others were on the vocational track that early, too. By giving more specialized classes, I think the passing rates will go up. I like the idea of subject specific courses and I like offering vocational math and English courses. I also think Speech should be taken by all students, since everyone needs to know how to speak in front of others.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Education is, and will always be important, but not everyone likes to sit in class and listen to lectures all day. There are students who aren't the best at school, or who don't fit the description of "the perfect student", but have other talents that teachers don't consider. Maybe a student is terrible when it comes to core classes, but can surpass all exspectations when it comes to electives such as Ag or Auto. Teachers need to understand that not all kids like to sit in classrooms all day, but have so much talent else where.
    -Nikki McMullen

    ReplyDelete
  11. I am a optimist, and I do believe that every person can get an education after high school. They may not see the bad side of not having a college degree until they are seeking employment.
    Austin Winkler
    4th

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think education is very important. But I think there should be more curriculum for different students that are interested in different things. I think that would make more students interested in school. Because they could chose classes that suit them!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Mr. Ogle,
    I would definately say that you are an optimist just because of the way you act in class. You're always saying something weird/funny to just try to get us to laugh and keep us interested in what is going on!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Mr. Ogle,
    I would definately say that you are an optimist just because of the way you act in class. You're always saying something weird/funny to just try to get us to laugh and keep us interested in what is going on!

    Ashlee Sinclair 2nd Hour

    -By the way, I reposted this because I forgot my name.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Its hard to judge if your an optimist or not. One day you might think your not then the next day you'll think you are.

    ReplyDelete