Change has a considerable psychological impact on the human mind. To the fearful it is threatening because it means that things may get worse. To the hopeful it is encouraging because things may get better. To the confident it is inspiring because the challenge exists to make things better. ~King Whitney, Jr.
I read a lot of stuff on twitter and blogs about changing education. I talk to students about what they would like to see implemented at our high school. I talk to colleagues about what changes we think would make us more effective in the classroom. I listen to politicians and commentators talk about large-scale, mandated education reform. It would appear to any observer that change is coming for the education system. My belief is that the momentum for that change is building in all of the wrong places.
At the national level, people who rarely, if ever, step foot into a classroom are leveraging funding and political clout to enact change in the form of more nationalize standards and testing, but at the local level, teachers and administrators who actually do the work of educating on a daily basis realize that none of those things will really bring about the kind of improvements that need to be made. It would be like setting out to remodel a house and bringing a camera to document your progress as the only tool. Testing does not improve student learning; it only measures it.
Time and again, I hear smart people I work with and others I only know online put forth excellent plans for revamping the way in which education is offered to students. Most of it is almost completely budget neutral, so money is not the issue. It is not that we can't afford to try something new; the problem is gaining enough support to give it a shot, or even to settle on which direction to go. The second problem, I think, can be easily solved by taking the time to sit down with all stakeholders and have a long, detailed, and exhaustive discussion until everyone feels that the collaborative plan is the best possible. The disagreements I've had with people end up being matters of semantics rather than actual concrete differences of vision, so I'm sure time and effort could bring those in favor of changes together.
The problem that does not seem to go away is that of people feeling the current system works fine just the way it is. For these people, I don't know what to say. Nowhere else in our society does there exist a system that has remained as unchanged as education for as long as education has remained largely unchanged. We are using and education model developed during the Industrial Revolution to prepare students for jobs in the Technology Revolution. We are following a system designed to produce factory workers to educate students who will be entering a marketplace for people with skills we are unable to develop in our classrooms as they exist today. It is not surprising that a growing number of young people are failing out of college and ending up living with their parents well into adulthood.
In the back of my mind, I can't help but wonder if these people really believe the current system works, or if they are simply afraid of what a changed system would resemble. Would they be needed? Would they be as good at it as they are at the current way of doing things? Would they go from admired and respected to outdated and useless? I think the biggest hurdle for change in education today is taking those who are afraid and inspiring them to be confident that we can do better. We can be more innovative and effective than the teachers we had. We can be better than the generations that came before us. We can revolutionize education and improve the lives of our students by simply believing that our ideas are just as valid, or more valid, than the ideas of the men who implemented the current system, and by doing so, we are not saying that the old system was bad or flawed, but simply that we have outgrown it the way a child outgrows their clothes. The bottom line is that if we are afraid to venture forward into the unknown on our own terms, we will be forced into on someone else's.
I agree with you completely, except that I am more pessimistic (go figure) about getting EVERYONE on the same page.
ReplyDeleteI think we should go with a "majority rules" plan. If we wait until we have total agreement on the staff, I'll be dead - or at least retired.
If someone doesn't like the way the bus is going, he or she can get off and walk!
As much as we've discussed things this school year, I am looking forward to summer school improvement.
ReplyDeleteMe too, Mr. T! Ogle, I love your analogy about using a camera to remodel a house! Good stuff here!
ReplyDeleteI liked the analogy about the camera. I agree with it, because I do not think that standardized tests help people to learn. They just see how much we have learned.31
ReplyDeleteNic
I disagree with where you said that education is changing slowly. Technology is being incorporated into education much more than before. Computer classes are being taught at much younger grades and with more detail. 34
ReplyDeletenic
Nic, you are absolutely correct about technology really coming on strong in education throughout the last 10-15 years. When I took my first typing class in junior high, we learned on typewriters. My daughter will probably be using computers in kindergarten. However, the change I am talking about is a change in the system- the way in which education is structured and delivered. Technology is great, but it is just window dressing. I think we need to look at the way in which we create classes and what kind of learning outcomes we are trying to accomplish. We have everything arranged in a compartmentalized fashion with schools as an assembly line. While that worked during the Industrial Revolution, we are now into a Technological Revolution that requires more dynamic thinkers and problem-solvers. We need to overhaul the system to prepare you guys for that kind of environment.
ReplyDeleteThe school should just stay the same until the summer then it can change like for instance they need to stick with one way for freshmeat and sophomores to sign in at lunch instead of changing 3or4 times
ReplyDeleteI disagree with John, I see where he is coming from but tests do help people learn. Today, most kids just care about not getting grounded and staying out of lunch bunch so when they are studying like crazy, they accidentally retain some of that knowledge later on. Although I do agree with Matt, they should just have one process in the lunch line. At the beginning of the year when the lady would see us and automatically know our names that was a lot faster then swiping a card.
ReplyDeleteKevin Dalia
-Tyler Tingley
ReplyDeleteMr. Ogle i think the same thing about change. I think its all headed in the wrong way too, because the people who are making change have never been in a classroom before.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree. Right now, I am hearing the U.S. is not at strict or dilligent in schooling as other countries. They have middle school students learning geometry when I am taking it as a sophmore. We need to push foward and make huge changes if we want to keep up with the rest of the world.
ReplyDeleteXavier Holt, 6th Hour, English II
I love the last sentence in this blog! If we don't look for challenges, or changes and actually strive for them on our own terms we may have to do them at somebody else's and that may not be as enjoyable and life changing as it would be if you were to endeavor for it for yourself! You only live once, do what makes you happy. Don't do things that are going to change your life based on others opinions or feelings. Life's about making yourself happy and being content with your own life.
ReplyDeleteI think change is good but not always. I think that not everything should have to be done on the internet. I dont have it at my house and my dad refuses to get internet. It's great if you have time at school to use it.
ReplyDeleteoakley haddix